Like my title? I was aiming for an attention-grabber…
But a more accurate title would be, “Socialization Reconsidered.” My husband and I have been wrestling through questions on the subject of healthy socialization for our daughters. We homeschool, but so far we’ve felt like a square peg in the various round holes offered as organized social groups: our local homeschool support chapter, a Classical Conversations pilot group starting up in the area, and a local homeschool co-op.
Here’s what I don’t need:
- teaching responsibilities beyond what I’m doing with my kids (required in a co-op);
- business meetings (our local homeschool chapter’s monthly meetings);
- someone shaping my curriculum for me (Classical Conversations).
Here’s what my daughters don’t need:
- to be shoved into a clique of homeschooled kids who form a closed circle and told, “Go be socialized!”
- a setting that heaps on extra or irrelevant academic requirements;
- a program (vs. a community. There’s a difference.)
So far we’ve had a good experience enrolling my older daughter in basketball, some church activities for kids, horseback riding lessons, and swimming lessons. But what these lack is freedom. Somehow none of them have resulted in friendships that go beyond the bounds of whatever activity is central.
Here’s the thing, though: my daughters are glowing! They’re not pining away for social contacts, though they enjoy being with other kids when it happens. They’re friendly and outgoing. They give no appearance of lacking anything.
So how do I evaluate all this? As a person who enjoys people, but finds it pretty easy to be alone too, I’m thinking that they’re not in bad shape. They’re certainly not dependent personality types. But at the same time, I want to be living a realistic human life; we need other people, we need friends. The Well-Trained Mind does a great job of critiquing public education’s view of “socialization” as a competetive model, vs. the family as a cooperative model. A child taken out of public school isn’t removed from social influence, just placed in a different social setting organized around different values. For all the touting of public school as a way to socialize kids, I don’t see a very impressive level of civility or healthy social functioning anywhere in our society, from our public institutions right on down.
Family is a nourishing, realistic social context, but I want to supplement and ground us in a relational world bigger than just our family. It’s hard to find or create ways to do this that don’t involve paying money and signing up for a program. Church can be a place to move toward something more real than programmed, and I feel like we’ve found a church where this begins to be a real possibility. It can provide a bigger family than our own, one that spreads beyond Sunday morning. This is a family endeavor, though, not a drop-off activity; it’s an outgrowth of family life, not separate from it.
Another idea we’ve been playing with is passion-centric, rather than people-centric or curriculum-centric, social life. In other words, rather than enrolling in a co-op of some kind, we have this horse-passion going in my 7-year-old. It’s lasted a year or more, and there’s a good chance it’s here to stay. Why not seek out as many opportunities as we can that will enable her to run with this — more riding lessons, helping at a stable, etc. — and letting a constellation of relationships form in that environment?
Here’s what I keep coming back to: C.S. Lewis. Denise Levertov. Maurice Sendak. Madeleine L’Engle. These are not only remarkable artists and thinkers, but contented people. What do they all have in common? “Isolated” childhoods. They’re products of solitude, time spent between the covers of books and chasing imaginative pursuits with a pencil. Exceptionally gifted, no doubt. But I wonder how many average-looking people have exceptional gifts that never burst into flame because they never experienced a vacuum in a world increasingly full of chatter. These names we all know did. And they turned out all right, didn’t they?
6 responses so far ↓
Ruth // April 9, 2008 at 3:01 pm
Yes, they did. We often have a strange idea of what kids “need.” I think you guys are doing great and I agree with your idea of a passion-centric social life.
JW // April 10, 2008 at 11:43 pm
Yeah. I’m with Ruth. You are doing a good thing for the girls and as you say - they are glowing! You can always find all kinds of clubs or groups in your area for various interests - book clubs, photography clubs, hiking groups, volunteer groups, bird-watching, gardening, etc. Making your church become a part of your family is also a really great move. I’m glad that you feel you have finally found someplace to call home again! Certainly your girls are not lacking in any social skills. They are really wonderful!
Lisa, The Correspondent // April 11, 2008 at 2:36 am
I agree with you about the organized social groups, including churches with a ton of programs. If you think about it, where else are we more segregated from our family these days than in a mainstream church?
One of the things we love to do as a family is to have hospitality dinners. We focus primarily on folks of all ages at church that we’d like to get to know better, but we also enjoy close friends and like-minded home educators as well.
All the kids help get the house ready, and the girls do most of the food prep. We all sit at the same table at dinner, and we work questions into the conversation for our guests, asking them how they met, where they work, what their testimony is (if they profess to be Christians), where their children live (if they have older adult children), etc.
We have done this on different nights and with varying frequency in the past. My favorite season was when we had folks over once a week.
These hospitality dinners are wonderful ministry and outreach opportunities, and they help us get to know people better and feel much more at ease with them when we see them again.
writer2b // April 11, 2008 at 10:13 am
Hospitality dinners: what a great idea! I enjoy having people over, and had never thought of giving the kids some ownership in the affair — planning questions, helping get ready, etc. We’re definitely going to try that!
Shannon // April 20, 2008 at 5:17 am
Thank you for your post. It is an encouragement to me right now, as I’ve been thinking a lot about socialization and my oldest son, who craves friendships outside of the family - maybe b/c he’s the only boy sibling. I love your idea of “passion-centric” socialization. I’ll be blogging about socialization soon, and if you don’t mind, I’d like to link over to your post. Thanks!
Blessings,
Shannon
http://www.shannon-songofmyheart.blogspot.com/
writer2b // April 20, 2008 at 11:19 am
Hi Shannon, thanks for stopping by. I’ll look forward to reading your thoughts!
Leave a Comment